linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] part2: kill pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191129115837.7hzuyqlmhbqsi4zm@pathway.suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 29 Nov 2019 12:58:37 +0100
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc:     joe@...ches.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tj@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
        sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] part2: kill pr_warning from kernel

On Thu 2019-11-28 08:47:48, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> This is the part2 of kill pr_warning, as most pr_warning conversion merged
> into v5.5, let's cleanup the last two stragglers. Then, completely drop
> pr_warning defination in printk.h and check in checkpatch.pl.
> 
> Part1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190920062544.180997-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
> 
> Kefeng Wang (4):
>   workqueue: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning
>   staging: isdn: gigaset: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning

This one is already in mainline via staging tree.

>   printk: Drop pr_warning definition
>   checkpatch: Drop pr_warning check

The other patches are committed in printk.git, branch
for-5.5-pr-warning-removal.

I am going to sent pull request after 5.5-rc1 is tagged.
It is should be fine according to linux-next. But I am not
sure if all coming changes are really tested in linux-next.

Best Regards,
Petr