[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e32f48b2-2286-912f-b8e2-1b1bcd892e07@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 20:56:01 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
CC: <joe@...ches.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <tj@...nel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] part2: kill pr_warning from kernel
On 2019/11/29 19:58, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2019-11-28 08:47:48, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> This is the part2 of kill pr_warning, as most pr_warning conversion merged
>> into v5.5, let's cleanup the last two stragglers. Then, completely drop
>> pr_warning defination in printk.h and check in checkpatch.pl.
>>
>> Part1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190920062544.180997-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
>>
>> Kefeng Wang (4):
>> workqueue: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning
>> staging: isdn: gigaset: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning
>
> This one is already in mainline via staging tree.
>
>> printk: Drop pr_warning definition
>> checkpatch: Drop pr_warning check
>
> The other patches are committed in printk.git, branch
> for-5.5-pr-warning-removal.
>
> I am going to sent pull request after 5.5-rc1 is tagged.
> It is should be fine according to linux-next. But I am not
> sure if all coming changes are really tested in linux-next.
>
Hi Petr, thanks, the issue will always be there, so let's remove
the definition ASAP, and we can fix the follow-up possible use :)
> Best Regards,
> Petr
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists