linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2] x86/fpu: Don't cache access to fpu_fpregs_owner

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d99a4a85441d48b1b34a7fb648d12379@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Nov 2019 16:57:42 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Sebastian Andrzej Siewior' <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>
CC:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@...il.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>, "ian@...s.com" <ian@...s.com>,
        Austin Clements <austin@...gle.com>,
        David Chase <drchase@...ang.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] x86/fpu: Don't cache access to fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx

From Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> Sent: 28 November 2019 08:53
> The state/owner of FPU is saved fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx by pointing to the
> context that is currently loaded. It never changed during the life time
> of a task and remained stable/constant.
> 
> Since deferred loading the FPU registers on return to userland, the
> content of fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx may change during preemption and must
> not be cached.
> This went unnoticed for some time and was now noticed, in particular
> gcc-9 is able to cache that load in copy_fpstate_to_sigframe() and reuse
> it in the retry loop:
> 
>   copy_fpstate_to_sigframe()
>     load fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx and save on stack
>     fpregs_lock()
>     copy_fpregs_to_sigframe() /* failed */
>     fpregs_unlock()
>          *** PREEMPTION, another uses FPU, changes fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx ***
> 
>     fault_in_pages_writeable() /* succeed, retry */
> 
>     fpregs_lock()
> 	__fpregs_load_activate()
> 	  fpregs_state_valid() /* uses fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx from stack */
>     copy_fpregs_to_sigframe() /* succeeds, random FPU content */

Should both fpregs_lock() and fpregs_unlock() contain a barrier() (or "memory" clobber)
do stop the compiler moving anything across them?

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)