[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191202071021.1251-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:10:21 +0800
From: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
To: <maz@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <jason@...edaemon.net>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Reference to its_invall_cmd descriptor when building INVALL
It looks like an obvious mistake to use its_mapc_cmd descriptor when
building the INVALL command block. It so far worked by luck because
both its_mapc_cmd.col and its_invall_cmd.col sit at the same offset of
the ITS command descriptor, but we should not rely on it.
Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index c52cc8d6d6b8..b3fec78b2226 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ static struct its_collection *its_build_invall_cmd(struct its_node *its,
struct its_cmd_desc *desc)
{
its_encode_cmd(cmd, GITS_CMD_INVALL);
- its_encode_collection(cmd, desc->its_mapc_cmd.col->col_id);
+ its_encode_collection(cmd, desc->its_invall_cmd.col->col_id);
its_fixup_cmd(cmd);
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists