[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c63647bb1b13cc05c9cecdd7f25e497ab9416e4f.camel@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 13:22:09 +0100
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
To: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, mbrugger@...e.com,
maz@...nel.org, phil@...pberrypi.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jeremy.linton@....com, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] PCI: brcmstb: add MSI capability
On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 12:20 +0000, Andrew Murray wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 10:59:36AM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > On Fri, 2019-11-29 at 15:46 +0000, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:19:43AM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > > From: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>
> > > >
> > > > This adds MSI support to the Broadcom STB PCIe host controller. The MSI
> > > > controller is physically located within the PCIe block, however, there
> > > > is no reason why the MSI controller could not be moved elsewhere in the
> > > > future. MSIX is not supported by the HW.
> > > >
> > > > Since the internal Brcmstb MSI controller is intertwined with the PCIe
> > > > controller, it is not its own platform device but rather part of the
> > > > PCIe platform device.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>
> > > > Co-developed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Changes since v2 (kept Marc's Reviewed-by as changes didn't affect irq
> > > > subsystem stuff or seem petty enough):
> > > > - Use standard APIs on register operations
> > > > - Get rid of revision code
> > >
> > > Do any RPI4's have a HW revision of less than 33?
> >
> > No, IIRC it's actually revision 34. I had left that bit of code in,
> > following
> > the same train of thought as with the of_data on the device-tree part of the
> > driver: "It's harmless and should make accomodating other devices easier."
> > It
> > turned out not to be such a great approach. Lesson's learned. So I decided
> > to
> > remove it.
>
> OK you can add my:
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew Murray
Thanks!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists