[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB7023CAEB8ADA6B1CA0907A72EE430@VI1PR04MB7023.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 05:07:48 +0000
From: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
CC: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] clk: imx: clk-pll14xx: Switch to clk_hw based API
On 2019-12-02 4:26 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] clk: imx: clk-pll14xx: Switch to clk_hw based API
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 01:40:54PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>>>
>>> Switch the imx_clk_pll14xx function to clk_hw based API, rename
>>> accordingly and add a macro for clk based legacy. This allows us to
>>> move closer to a clear split between consumer and provider clk APIs.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h index
>>> bc5bb6ac8636..5038622f1a72 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
>>> @@ -97,8 +97,12 @@ extern struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx_1443x_pll;
>>> #define imx_clk_mux(name, reg, shift, width, parents, num_parents) \
>>> imx_clk_hw_mux(name, reg, shift, width, parents, num_parents)->clk
>>>
>>> -struct clk *imx_clk_pll14xx(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
>>> - void __iomem *base, const struct imx_pll14xx_clk *pll_clk);
>>> +#define imx_clk_pll14xx(name, parent_name, base, pll_clk) \
>>> + imx_clk_hw_pll14xx(name, parent_name, base, pll_clk)->clk
>>> +
>>
>> I would suggest to use an inline function for this, which will be more readable
>> and complying to kernel coding style.
>
> ok, I'll send out v2.
Blindly dereferencing ->clk will crash instead of propagating errors so
you might want to use the to_clk helper from here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11257811/
--
Regards,
Leonard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists