[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191202230642.GD32696@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 00:06:42 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@....com>,
Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/13] selftests/resctrl: Add README for resctrl tests
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 10:53:35AM -0800, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> Babu's major contributions are in v5 where he virtually touched every
> patch. He sent out v5 and put Signed-off-by: Babu Moger in each patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1033532/
>
> That's why I keep his SOB in v6-v8 in each patch.
For that you either need to use
Co-developed-by: Babu
or state the fact that Babu did contribute to the patches in freetext in
the commit messages.
As it is now, it is not clear what it means. You could've kept the order
from v5 since you took his submission and could've done:
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
to show you're the author, Babu handled them further and you're sending
the patchset now, but the other thing I suggested above is more clear
IMO.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists