[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191202234244.GC220960@romley-ivt3.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:42:44 -0800
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@....com>,
Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/13] selftests/resctrl: Add README for resctrl tests
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 12:06:42AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 10:53:35AM -0800, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > Babu's major contributions are in v5 where he virtually touched every
> > patch. He sent out v5 and put Signed-off-by: Babu Moger in each patch:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1033532/
> >
> > That's why I keep his SOB in v6-v8 in each patch.
>
> For that you either need to use
>
> Co-developed-by: Babu
>
> or state the fact that Babu did contribute to the patches in freetext in
> the commit messages.
>
> As it is now, it is not clear what it means. You could've kept the order
> from v5 since you took his submission and could've done:
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
>
> to show you're the author, Babu handled them further and you're sending
> the patchset now, but the other thing I suggested above is more clear
> IMO.
Ok. I will add Co-developed-by: Babu in the patches.
Should I send v9 patch set with only the Co-developed-by changes?
Thanks.
-Fenghua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists