[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191202011721.GA17574@dragon>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:17:24 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: "mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] clk: imx: clk-pll14xx: Switch to clk_hw based API
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 01:40:54PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> Switch the imx_clk_pll14xx function to clk_hw based API, rename
> accordingly and add a macro for clk based legacy. This allows us to
> move closer to a clear split between consumer and provider clk APIs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> drivers/clk/imx/clk.h | 8 ++++++--
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> index 5c458199060a..fa76e04251c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> @@ -369,13 +369,14 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_pll1443x_ops = {
> .set_rate = clk_pll1443x_set_rate,
> };
>
> -struct clk *imx_clk_pll14xx(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> - void __iomem *base,
> - const struct imx_pll14xx_clk *pll_clk)
> +struct clk_hw *imx_clk_hw_pll14xx(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> + void __iomem *base,
> + const struct imx_pll14xx_clk *pll_clk)
> {
> struct clk_pll14xx *pll;
> - struct clk *clk;
> + struct clk_hw *hw;
> struct clk_init_data init;
> + int ret;
> u32 val;
>
> pll = kzalloc(sizeof(*pll), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -412,12 +413,15 @@ struct clk *imx_clk_pll14xx(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> val &= ~BYPASS_MASK;
> writel_relaxed(val, pll->base + GNRL_CTL);
>
> - clk = clk_register(NULL, &pll->hw);
> - if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> - pr_err("%s: failed to register pll %s %lu\n",
> - __func__, name, PTR_ERR(clk));
> + hw = &pll->hw;
> +
> + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, hw);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("%s: failed to register pll %s %d\n",
> + __func__, name, ret);
> kfree(pll);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> }
>
> - return clk;
> + return hw;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> index bc5bb6ac8636..5038622f1a72 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> @@ -97,8 +97,12 @@ extern struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx_1443x_pll;
> #define imx_clk_mux(name, reg, shift, width, parents, num_parents) \
> imx_clk_hw_mux(name, reg, shift, width, parents, num_parents)->clk
>
> -struct clk *imx_clk_pll14xx(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> - void __iomem *base, const struct imx_pll14xx_clk *pll_clk);
> +#define imx_clk_pll14xx(name, parent_name, base, pll_clk) \
> + imx_clk_hw_pll14xx(name, parent_name, base, pll_clk)->clk
> +
I would suggest to use an inline function for this, which will be more
readable and complying to kernel coding style.
Shawn
> +struct clk_hw *imx_clk_hw_pll14xx(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> + void __iomem *base,
> + const struct imx_pll14xx_clk *pll_clk);
>
> struct clk *imx_clk_pllv1(enum imx_pllv1_type type, const char *name,
> const char *parent, void __iomem *base);
> --
> 2.16.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists