linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] PCI: iproc: Add INTx support with better modeling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf7d=Gw24MTq2q3BKspkLEDDM24GVK4Zh_4zfZEzVuZjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Dec 2019 21:27:30 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
Cc:     Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@...adcom.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] PCI: iproc: Add INTx support with better modeling

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 5:55 PM Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 10:27:02AM +0530, Srinath Mannam wrote:

> > +     /* go through INTx A, B, C, D until all interrupts are handled */
> > +     do {
> > +             status = iproc_pcie_read_reg(pcie, IPROC_PCIE_INTX_CSR);
>
> By performing this read once and outside of the do/while loop you may improve
> performance. I wonder how probable it is to get another INTx whilst handling
> one?

May I ask how it can be improved?
One read will be needed any way, and so does this code.

> > +             for_each_set_bit(bit, &status, PCI_NUM_INTX) {
> > +                     virq = irq_find_mapping(pcie->irq_domain, bit);
> > +                     if (virq)
> > +                             generic_handle_irq(virq);
> > +                     else
> > +                             dev_err(dev, "unexpected INTx%u\n", bit);
> > +             }
> > +     } while ((status & SYS_RC_INTX_MASK) != 0);

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko