[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191204091746.vql5yuajtzmr25lp@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 10:17:46 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: "rjui@...adcom.com" <rjui@...adcom.com>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"sbranden@...adcom.com" <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alice Guo <alice.guo@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 08:41:14AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 04:20:45AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > >
> > > platform_irq_count() is the more generic way (independent of device
> > > trees) to determine the count of available interrupts. So use this
> > > instead.
> > >
> > > As platform_irq_count() might return an error code (which of_irq_count
> > > doesn't) some additional handling is necessary.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > V2:
> > > Update commit log, and add err handling Not tested, just code
> > > inspection
> > >
> > > drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c | 12 +++++++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c index 4122683eb1f9..52ff56166263
> > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> > > @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
> > > #include <linux/io.h>
> > > #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> > > #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > -#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > > #include <linux/init.h>
> > > #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > > #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> @@ -586,11 +585,18 @@ static
> > > int bcm_kona_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >
> > > kona_gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
> > > chip = &kona_gpio->gpio_chip;
> > > - kona_gpio->num_bank = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
> > > - if (kona_gpio->num_bank == 0) {
> > > + ret = platform_irq_count(pdev);
> > > + if (!ret) {
> > > dev_err(dev, "Couldn't determine # GPIO banks\n");
> > > return -ENOENT;
> > > + } else if (ret < 0) {
> > > + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't determine GPIO banks: %d\n",
> > > + ret);
> >
> > You can use the new %pe feature here:
>
> Checkpatch reports warning:
>
> WARNING: Invalid vsprintf pointer extension '%pe'
> #49: FILE: drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c:593:
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't determine GPIO banks: (%pe)\n",
> + ERR_PTR(ret));
Then you test with a tree older than
1d28122131b263f169a7f2d288178a56c69ee076. Then you also might not have
57f5677e535ba24b8926a7125be2ef8d7f09323c which you need to make %pe
work.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists