[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191203202200.5565c451@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 20:22:00 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@...labora.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>,
fabien.lahoudere@...labora.com,
Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brodkin@...opsys.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64_defconfig: Normalize x86_64 defconfig
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:15:12 +0800
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> Instead of keeping this known good config somewhere outside it should
> be just equal to defconfig. There is no point to trim it with
> savedefconfig and then later experience missing options (because some
> option was a dependency but now is not). Instead, all visible options
> (possible to select) should be explicitly defined by defconfig to
> avoid what happened with DEBUG_FS.
I totally agree.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists