[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b922079aeed04f31ff67b3e7fb78022@www.loen.fr>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 12:21:05 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: <anarsoul@...il.com>
Cc: <marc.zyngier@....com>, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
arm-linux <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: arch_timer: Workaround for Allwinner A64 timer instability
[please note that my email address has changed]
On 2019-12-04 04:18, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
[...]
> Unfortunately this patch doesn't completely eliminate the jumps.
> There
> have been reports from users who still saw 95y jump even with the
> patch applied.
>
> Personally I've seen it once or twice on my Pine64-LTS.
>
> Looks like we need bigger hammer. Does anyone have any idea what it
> could be?
Which kernel version did you see this happening on?
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists