[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+E=qVc-BA_W8O1qpkKgg5pDax-Jbvmpc-TB7gWB7CfYAxXCXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 07:37:13 -0800
From: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
arm-linux <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: arch_timer: Workaround
for Allwinner A64 timer instability
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 4:21 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> [please note that my email address has changed]
>
> On 2019-12-04 04:18, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Unfortunately this patch doesn't completely eliminate the jumps.
> > There
> > have been reports from users who still saw 95y jump even with the
> > patch applied.
> >
> > Personally I've seen it once or twice on my Pine64-LTS.
> >
> > Looks like we need bigger hammer. Does anyone have any idea what it
> > could be?
>
> Which kernel version did you see this happening on?
I've seen it on 5.3
> M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists