[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191206103453.GC10451@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 10:34:53 +0000
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wm5100: add missed regulator_bulk_disable
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:53:00PM +0800, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> The driver forgets to call regulator_bulk_disable() in remove like that
> in probe failure.
> Add the missed call to fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/codecs/wm5100.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm5100.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm5100.c
> index 91cc63c5a51f..d985b2061169 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm5100.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm5100.c
> @@ -2653,6 +2653,8 @@ static int wm5100_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c)
> gpio_set_value_cansleep(wm5100->pdata.ldo_ena, 0);
> gpio_free(wm5100->pdata.ldo_ena);
> }
> + regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(wm5100->core_supplies),
> + wm5100->core_supplies);
>
This is a bit trickier than this since these regulators are being
controlled by PM runtime, and it doesn't necessarily leave things
in an enabled state when it is disabled.
Thanks,
Charles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists