[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1575927416.4557.25.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 16:36:56 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
Eric Ricther <erichte@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] powerpc: Enabling IMA arch specific secure boot
policies
On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 12:27 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Hi Mimi,
>
> On 10/30/2019 8:31 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> > This patchset extends the previous version[1] by adding support for
> > checking against a blacklist of binary hashes.
> >
> > The IMA subsystem supports custom, built-in, arch-specific policies to
> > define the files to be measured and appraised. These policies are honored
> > based on priority, where arch-specific policy is the highest and custom
> > is the lowest.
>
> Has this change been signed off and merged for the next update of the
> kernel (v5.5)?
Yes, refer to the linuxppc mailing list archives.
Mimi
[1] https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists