[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5254346f-4ba7-c820-e127-d46b84f2e6e6@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 12:27:24 -0800
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
Eric Ricther <erichte@...ux.ibm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] powerpc: Enabling IMA arch specific secure boot
policies
Hi Mimi,
On 10/30/2019 8:31 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> This patchset extends the previous version[1] by adding support for
> checking against a blacklist of binary hashes.
>
> The IMA subsystem supports custom, built-in, arch-specific policies to
> define the files to be measured and appraised. These policies are honored
> based on priority, where arch-specific policy is the highest and custom
> is the lowest.
Has this change been signed off and merged for the next update of the
kernel (v5.5)?
thanks,
-lakshmi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists