linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mwifiex: drop most magic numbers from mwifiex_process_tdls_action

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0101016eea4faad7-ffccbda4-deee-456f-9e01-cd4a52bc9fd1-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Dec 2019 10:58:40 +0000
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi.bhat@....com>,
        Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@...vell.com>,
        Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
        Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
        solar@...nwall.com, wangqize888888888@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mwifiex: drop most magic numbers from mwifiex_process_tdls_action_frame()

Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> writes:

> AFAICT, the existing commit (1e58252e334d) isn't wrong, per se -- just
> very poorly styled -- so this probably doesn't need to go to -stable.
> Not sure if it's a candidate for wireless-drivers (where the original
> commit currently sites) vs. wireless-drivers-next.

I'll try to do so that I'll put this patch to "Awaiting Upstream" state
and apply it to w-d-next once 1e58252e334d is merged to w-d-next. Feel
free to remind me then that happens :)

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches