linux-kernel - RE: recvfrom/recvmsg performance and CONFIG_HARDENED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <efffc167eff1475f94f745f733171d59@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Dec 2019 11:01:30 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Eric Dumazet' <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: recvfrom/recvmsg performance and CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY

From: Eric Dumazet
> Sent: 06 December 2019 14:22
...
> Real question is : Do you actually need to use recvmsg() instead of recvfrom() ?
> If recvmsg() provides additional cmsg, this is not surprising it is more expensive.

Except I'm not passing in a buffer for it.
The reason I'm looking at recvmsg is that I'd like to use recvmmsg it order to
read out more than one message from a socket without doing an extra poll().
Note that I don't expect there to be a second message most of the time and
almost never a third one.

Although I think that will only ever 'win' if recvmmsg() called vfs_poll() to find
if there was more data to read before doing any of the copy_from_user() etc.

> recvmsg() also uses an indirect call, so CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y is probably hurting.

I don't have CONFIG_RETPOLINE enabled, the compiler I'm using is too old.
(gcc 4.7.3).

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)