[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c06752c858229854b37af3b47779b126@www.loen.fr>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:17:48 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <chenxiang66@...ilicon.com>,
<bigeasy@...utronix.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<hare@...e.com>, <hch@....de>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
<bvanassche@....org>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/1] genirq: Make threaded handler use irq affinity for managed interrupt
On 2019-12-09 15:09, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
[slight digression]
> My idea here is slightly different: can't we leverage SMT?
> Most modern CPUs do SMT (I guess even ARM does it nowadays)
> (Yes, I know about spectre and things. We're talking performance here
> :-)
I only know two of those: Cavium TX2 and ARM Neoverse-E1.
ARM SMT CPUs are the absolute minority (and I can't say I'm
displeased).
M,
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists