[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd4192c6-351a-144f-9c31-d5a89c6fdedf@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 16:25:01 +0100
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, chenxiang66@...ilicon.com,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hare@...e.com,
hch@....de, axboe@...nel.dk, bvanassche@....org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/1] genirq: Make threaded handler use irq affinity
for managed interrupt
On 12/9/19 4:17 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2019-12-09 15:09, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>
> [slight digression]
>
>> My idea here is slightly different: can't we leverage SMT?
>> Most modern CPUs do SMT (I guess even ARM does it nowadays)
>> (Yes, I know about spectre and things. We're talking performance here :-)
>
> I only know two of those: Cavium TX2 and ARM Neoverse-E1.
> ARM SMT CPUs are the absolute minority (and I can't say I'm displeased).
>
Ach, too bad.
Still a nice idea, putting SMT finally to some use ...
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@...e.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists