[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191209161627.GJ2810@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 17:16:27 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Peng Wang <rocking@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] schied/fair: Skip updating "contrib" without load
On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 12:14:22AM +0800, Peng Wang wrote:
> We only update load_sum/runnable_load_sum/util_sum with
> decayed old sum when load is clear.
What you're saying is that because of the:
if (!load)
runnable = running = 0;
clause in ___update_load_sum(), all the actual users of @contrib in
accumulate_sum():
if (load)
sa->load_sum += load * contrib;
if (runnable)
sa->runnable_load_sum += runnable * contrib;
if (running)
sa->util_sum += contrib << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
don't happen, and therefore we don't care what @contrib actually is and
calculating it is pointless.
I suppose that is so. did you happen to have performance numbers? Also,
I'm thinking this wants a comment.
> Signed-off-by: Peng Wang <rocking@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/pelt.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/pelt.c b/kernel/sched/pelt.c
> index a96db50..4392953 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/pelt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/pelt.c
> @@ -129,8 +129,9 @@ static u32 __accumulate_pelt_segments(u64 periods, u32 d1, u32 d3)
> * Step 2
> */
> delta %= 1024;
> - contrib = __accumulate_pelt_segments(periods,
> - 1024 - sa->period_contrib, delta);
> + if (load)
> + contrib = __accumulate_pelt_segments(periods,
> + 1024 - sa->period_contrib, delta);
> }
> sa->period_contrib = delta;
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists