linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] dt-bindings: Input: introduce new clock vibrator bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJ2v1fL7gkAg7C3GjokV7WD87S3P5HCwi-ZJ7EOjds8Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Dec 2019 10:16:26 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] dt-bindings: Input: introduce new clock vibrator bindings

On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 6:54 PM Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 07:56:10AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 6:25 PM Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Add support for clock-based vibrator devices where the speed can be
> > > controlled by changing the duty cycle.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
> > > ---
> > >  .../bindings/input/clk-vibrator.yaml          | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/clk-vibrator.yaml
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/clk-vibrator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/clk-vibrator.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..2103a5694fad
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/clk-vibrator.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/bindings/input/clk-vibrator.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: Clock vibrator
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
> > > +
> > > +description: |
> > > +  Support for clock-based vibrator devices where the speed can be controlled
> > > +  by changing the duty cycle.
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    const: clk-vibrator
> > > +
> > > +  clocks:
> > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > +
> > > +  clock-names:
> > > +    description: output clock that controls the speed
> > > +    items:
> > > +      - const: core
> >
> > No point in making up a name when there's only one clock, so drop.
>
> OK, will do.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > +  clock-frequency: true
> >
> > Given the frequency is variable, what does this mean in this case?
>
> The clock frequency is fixed. The duty cycle is what's variable.

That sounds like a PWM then...

Rob