linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] dt-bindings: Input: introduce new clock vibrator bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191209005436.GA13647@onstation.org>
Date:   Sun, 8 Dec 2019 19:54:36 -0500
From:   Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] dt-bindings: Input: introduce new clock vibrator
 bindings

On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 07:56:10AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 6:25 PM Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Add support for clock-based vibrator devices where the speed can be
> > controlled by changing the duty cycle.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/input/clk-vibrator.yaml          | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/clk-vibrator.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/clk-vibrator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/clk-vibrator.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..2103a5694fad
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/clk-vibrator.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/bindings/input/clk-vibrator.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Clock vibrator
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
> > +
> > +description: |
> > +  Support for clock-based vibrator devices where the speed can be controlled
> > +  by changing the duty cycle.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    const: clk-vibrator
> > +
> > +  clocks:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  clock-names:
> > +    description: output clock that controls the speed
> > +    items:
> > +      - const: core
> 
> No point in making up a name when there's only one clock, so drop.

OK, will do.

> 
> > +
> > +  clock-frequency: true
> 
> Given the frequency is variable, what does this mean in this case?

The clock frequency is fixed. The duty cycle is what's variable.

Brian



> 
> > +  enable-gpios:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  vcc-supply:
> > +    description: Regulator that provides power
> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - clocks
> > +  - clock-names
> > +  - clock-frequency
> 
> Add:
> 
> additionalProperties: false
> 
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,mmcc-msm8974.h>
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > +
> > +    vibrator {
> > +        compatible = "clk-vibrator";
> > +
> > +        vcc-supply = <&pm8941_l19>;
> > +
> > +        clocks = <&mmcc CAMSS_GP1_CLK>;
> > +        clock-names = "core";
> > +        clock-frequency = <24000>;
> > +
> > +        enable-gpios = <&msmgpio 60 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > +
> > +        pinctrl-names = "default";
> > +        pinctrl-0 = <&vibrator_pin>;
> > +    };
> > --
> > 2.21.0
> >