[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0402MB348586BEDA9BE13CEB10C75698580@VI1PR0402MB3485.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 16:23:45 +0000
From: Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@....com>
To: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
Aymen Sghaier <aymen.sghaier@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Add Crypto CAAM support
On 12/1/2019 12:52 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
> The i.MX8M Mini supports the same crypto engine as what is in
> the i.MX8MQ, but it is not currently present in the device tree,
> because it may be resricted by security features.
>
What exactly are you referring to?
> This patch places in into the device tree and marks it as disabled,
> but anyone not restricting the CAAM with secure mode functions
> can mark it as enabled.
>
Even if - due to export control regulations - CAAM is "trimmed down",
it loses only the encryption capabilities (hashing etc. still working).
Again, please clarify what you mean by "secure mode functions",
"security features" etc.
Horia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists