[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3841dcf6dab454445da7b225e0d45212@dev.tdt.de>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 06:28:53 +0100
From: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: andrew.hendry@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
linux-x25@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/x25: add new state X25_STATE_5
On 2019-12-07 20:59, David Miller wrote:
> From: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:18 +0100
>
>> + switch (frametype) {
>> +
>> + case X25_CLEAR_REQUEST:
>
> Please remove this unnecessary empty line.
>
>> + if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, X25_STD_MIN_LEN + 2))
>> + goto out_clear;
>
> A goto path for a single call site? Just inline the operations here.
Well, I was guided by the code style of the other states.
I could add a patch to also clean up the other states.
What do you think?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists