linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Update the tuning failed messages to pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9199c781-399b-8b7e-8454-6d67f41f48bb@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:07:25 +0530
From:   Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
To:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Update the tuning failed messages to pr_debug
 level

Hi,

On 06/12/19 5:13 pm, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> Tuning support in DDR50 speed mode was added in SD Specifications Part1
> Physical Layer Specification v3.01. Its not possible to distinguish
> between v3.00 and v3.01 from the SCR and that is why since
> commit 4324f6de6d2e ("mmc: core: enable CMD19 tuning for DDR50 mode")
> tuning failures are ignored in DDR50 speed mode.
> 
> Cards compatible with v3.00 don't respond to CMD19 in DDR50 and this
> error gets printed during enumeration and also if retune is triggered at
> any time during operation. Update the printk level to pr_debug so that
> these errors don't lead to false error reports.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 296d955ede59..42a9c8179da7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -2417,8 +2417,8 @@ static int __sdhci_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
>  		sdhci_send_tuning(host, opcode);
>  
>  		if (!host->tuning_done) {
> -			pr_info("%s: Tuning timeout, falling back to fixed sampling clock\n",
> -				mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
> +			pr_debug("%s: Tuning timeout, falling back to fixed sampling clock\n",
> +				 mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
>  			sdhci_abort_tuning(host, opcode);
>  			return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  		}
> 

Gentle ping.

Thanks,
Faiz