[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFqdFc1RMNu38d7b+s2Bpr49v-w18frGsPSxsYf924HLWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:51:12 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>,
Sayali Lokhande <sayalil@...eaurora.org>, cang@...eaurora.org,
Ram Prakash Gupta <rampraka@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-msm: Correct the offset and value for
DDR_CONFIG register
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 11:19, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti
<vbadigan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> The DDR_CONFIG register offset got updated after a specific
> minor version of sdcc V4. This offset change has not been properly
> taken care of while updating register changes for sdcc V5.
>
> Correcting proper offset for this register.
> Also updating this register value to reflect the recommended RCLK
> delay.
>
> Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>
I have applied this for fixes, however it seems like this should also
be tagged for stable, right?
Is there a specific commit this fixes or should we just find the
version it applies to?
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index b75c82d..3d0bb5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
>
> #define CORE_PWRSAVE_DLL BIT(3)
>
> -#define DDR_CONFIG_POR_VAL 0x80040853
> +#define DDR_CONFIG_POR_VAL 0x80040873
>
>
> #define INVALID_TUNING_PHASE -1
> @@ -148,8 +148,9 @@ struct sdhci_msm_offset {
> u32 core_ddr_200_cfg;
> u32 core_vendor_spec3;
> u32 core_dll_config_2;
> + u32 core_dll_config_3;
> + u32 core_ddr_config_old; /* Applicable to sdcc minor ver < 0x49 */
> u32 core_ddr_config;
> - u32 core_ddr_config_2;
> };
>
> static const struct sdhci_msm_offset sdhci_msm_v5_offset = {
> @@ -177,8 +178,8 @@ struct sdhci_msm_offset {
> .core_ddr_200_cfg = 0x224,
> .core_vendor_spec3 = 0x250,
> .core_dll_config_2 = 0x254,
> - .core_ddr_config = 0x258,
> - .core_ddr_config_2 = 0x25c,
> + .core_dll_config_3 = 0x258,
> + .core_ddr_config = 0x25c,
> };
>
> static const struct sdhci_msm_offset sdhci_msm_mci_offset = {
> @@ -207,8 +208,8 @@ struct sdhci_msm_offset {
> .core_ddr_200_cfg = 0x184,
> .core_vendor_spec3 = 0x1b0,
> .core_dll_config_2 = 0x1b4,
> - .core_ddr_config = 0x1b8,
> - .core_ddr_config_2 = 0x1bc,
> + .core_ddr_config_old = 0x1b8,
> + .core_ddr_config = 0x1bc,
> };
>
> struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops {
> @@ -253,6 +254,7 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host {
> const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset;
> bool use_cdr;
> u32 transfer_mode;
> + bool updated_ddr_cfg;
> };
>
> static const struct sdhci_msm_offset *sdhci_priv_msm_offset(struct sdhci_host *host)
> @@ -924,8 +926,10 @@ static int sdhci_msm_cdclp533_calibration(struct sdhci_host *host)
> static int sdhci_msm_cm_dll_sdc4_calibration(struct sdhci_host *host)
> {
> struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
> - u32 dll_status, config;
> + u32 dll_status, config, ddr_cfg_offset;
> int ret;
> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> const struct sdhci_msm_offset *msm_offset =
> sdhci_priv_msm_offset(host);
>
> @@ -938,8 +942,11 @@ static int sdhci_msm_cm_dll_sdc4_calibration(struct sdhci_host *host)
> * bootloaders. In the future, if this changes, then the desired
> * values will need to be programmed appropriately.
> */
> - writel_relaxed(DDR_CONFIG_POR_VAL, host->ioaddr +
> - msm_offset->core_ddr_config);
> + if (msm_host->updated_ddr_cfg)
> + ddr_cfg_offset = msm_offset->core_ddr_config;
> + else
> + ddr_cfg_offset = msm_offset->core_ddr_config_old;
> + writel_relaxed(DDR_CONFIG_POR_VAL, host->ioaddr + ddr_cfg_offset);
>
> if (mmc->ios.enhanced_strobe) {
> config = readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr +
> @@ -1899,6 +1906,9 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> msm_offset->core_vendor_spec_capabilities0);
> }
>
> + if (core_major == 1 && core_minor >= 0x49)
> + msm_host->updated_ddr_cfg = true;
> +
> /*
> * Power on reset state may trigger power irq if previous status of
> * PWRCTL was either BUS_ON or IO_HIGH_V. So before enabling pwr irq
> --
> Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists