lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:28:27 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: assign two bits to track SPTE kinds

On 11/12/19 20:13, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Assuming we haven't missed something, the easiest fix would be to reduce
> the MMIO generation by one bit and use bits 62:54 for the MMIO generation.

Yes, and I mistakenly thought it would be done just by adjusting 
PT64_SECOND_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT.

I will test and send formally something like this:

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 6f92b40d798c..aa2d86f42b9a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -405,11 +405,13 @@ static inline bool is_access_track_spte(u64 spte)
 }
 
 /*
- * Due to limited space in PTEs, the MMIO generation is a 19 bit subset of
+ * Due to limited space in PTEs, the MMIO generation is a 18 bit subset of
  * the memslots generation and is derived as follows:
  *
  * Bits 0-8 of the MMIO generation are propagated to spte bits 3-11
- * Bits 9-18 of the MMIO generation are propagated to spte bits 52-61
+ * Bits 9-17 of the MMIO generation are propagated to spte bits 54-62
  *
+ * We don't use bit 63 to avoid conflicting with the SVE bit in EPT PTEs.
+ *
  * The KVM_MEMSLOT_GEN_UPDATE_IN_PROGRESS flag is intentionally not included in
  * the MMIO generation number, as doing so would require stealing a bit from
@@ -418,15 +418,16 @@ static inline bool is_access_track_spte(u64 spte)
  * requires a full MMU zap).  The flag is instead explicitly queried when
  * checking for MMIO spte cache hits.
  */
-#define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(18, 0)
+#define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(17, 0)
 
 #define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_START		3
 #define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_END		11
 #define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_END, \
 						    MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_START)
 
-#define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_START	52
-#define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_END		61
+/* Leave room for SPTE_SPECIAL_MASK.  */
+#define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_START	PT64_SECOND_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT
+#define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_END		62
 #define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_END, \
 						    MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_START)
 static u64 generation_mmio_spte_mask(u64 gen)


Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ