[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eex9c20c.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:43:47 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Marios Pomonis <pomonis@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Finco <nifi@...gle.com>, Andrew Honig <ahonig@...gle.com>,
Marios Pomonis <pomonis@...gle.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] KVM: x86: Protect kvm_hv_msr_[get|set]_crash_data() from Spectre-v1/L1TF attacks
Marios Pomonis <pomonis@...gle.com> writes:
> This fixes Spectre-v1/L1TF vulnerabilities in kvm_hv_msr_get_crash_data()
> and kvm_hv_msr_set_crash_data().
> These functions contain index computations that use the
> (attacker-controlled) MSR number.
Just to educate myself,
in both cases 'index' is equal to 'msr - HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_P0' where
'msr' is constrained:
case HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_P0 ... HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_P4:
....
and moreover, kvm_hv_{get,set}_msr_common() is only being called for a
narrow set of MSRs. How can an atacker overcome these limitations?
>
> Fixes: commit e7d9513b60e8 ("kvm/x86: added hyper-v crash msrs into kvm hyperv context")
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Finco <nifi@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marios Pomonis <pomonis@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Honig <ahonig@...gle.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> index 23ff65504d7e..26408434b9bc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> @@ -809,11 +809,12 @@ static int kvm_hv_msr_get_crash_data(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> u32 index, u64 *pdata)
> {
> struct kvm_hv *hv = &vcpu->kvm->arch.hyperv;
> + size_t size = ARRAY_SIZE(hv->hv_crash_param);
>
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(index >= ARRAY_SIZE(hv->hv_crash_param)))
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(index >= size))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - *pdata = hv->hv_crash_param[index];
> + *pdata = hv->hv_crash_param[array_index_nospec(index, size)];
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -852,11 +853,12 @@ static int kvm_hv_msr_set_crash_data(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> u32 index, u64 data)
> {
> struct kvm_hv *hv = &vcpu->kvm->arch.hyperv;
> + size_t size = ARRAY_SIZE(hv->hv_crash_param);
>
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(index >= ARRAY_SIZE(hv->hv_crash_param)))
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(index >= size))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - hv->hv_crash_param[index] = data;
> + hv->hv_crash_param[array_index_nospec(index, size)] = data;
> return 0;
> }
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists