| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 12:12:36 +0100
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
'Linux Samsung SOC' <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] software node: rename is_array to is_inline
Dear All,
On 08.11.2019 05:22, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> We do not need a special flag to know if we are dealing with an array,
> as we can get that data from ratio between element length and the data
> size, however we do need a flag to know whether the data is stored
> directly inside property_entry or separately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Today I've noticed that this patch got merged to linux-next as commit
e6bff4665c595b5a4aff173848851ed49ac3bfad. Sadly it breaks DWC3/xHCI
driver operation on Samsung Exynos5 SoCs (and probably on other SoCs
which use DWC3 in host mode too). I get the following errors during boot:
dwc3 12000000.dwc3: failed to add properties to xHCI
dwc3 12000000.dwc3: failed to initialize host
dwc3: probe of 12000000.dwc3 failed with error -61
Here is a full kernel log from Exynos5250-based Snow Chromebook on KernelCI:
https://storage.kernelci.org/next/master/next-20191212/arm/exynos_defconfig/gcc-8/lab-collabora/boot-exynos5250-snow.txt
(lack of 'ref' clk is not related nor fatal to the driver operation).
The code which fails after this patch is located in
drivers/usb/dwc3/host.c. Let me know if I can help more in locating the bug.
> ---
> drivers/base/swnode.c | 12 +++++-------
> include/linux/property.h | 13 ++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c
> index d8d0dc0ca5acf..18a30fb3cc588 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c
> @@ -108,10 +108,7 @@ static const void *property_get_pointer(const struct property_entry *prop)
> if (!prop->length)
> return NULL;
>
> - if (prop->is_array)
> - return prop->pointer;
> -
> - return &prop->value;
> + return prop->is_inline ? &prop->value : prop->pointer;
> }
>
> static const void *property_entry_find(const struct property_entry *props,
> @@ -205,7 +202,7 @@ static void property_entry_free_data(const struct property_entry *p)
> const char * const *src_str;
> size_t i, nval;
>
> - if (p->is_array) {
> + if (!p->is_inline) {
> if (p->type == DEV_PROP_STRING && p->pointer) {
> src_str = p->pointer;
> nval = p->length / sizeof(const char *);
> @@ -250,7 +247,7 @@ static int property_entry_copy_data(struct property_entry *dst,
> const void *pointer = property_get_pointer(src);
> const void *new;
>
> - if (src->is_array) {
> + if (!src->is_inline) {
> if (!src->length)
> return -ENODATA;
>
> @@ -264,15 +261,16 @@ static int property_entry_copy_data(struct property_entry *dst,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - dst->is_array = true;
> dst->pointer = new;
> } else if (src->type == DEV_PROP_STRING) {
> new = kstrdup(src->value.str, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!new && src->value.str)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + dst->is_inline = true;
> dst->value.str = new;
> } else {
> + dst->is_inline = true;
> dst->value = src->value;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h
> index 48335288c2a96..dad0ad11b55e2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/property.h
> +++ b/include/linux/property.h
> @@ -227,15 +227,17 @@ static inline int fwnode_property_count_u64(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> * struct property_entry - "Built-in" device property representation.
> * @name: Name of the property.
> * @length: Length of data making up the value.
> - * @is_array: True when the property is an array.
> + * @is_inline: True when the property value is embedded in
> + * &struct property_entry instance.
> * @type: Type of the data in unions.
> - * @pointer: Pointer to the property (an array of items of the given type).
> - * @value: Value of the property (when it is a single item of the given type).
> + * @pointer: Pointer to the property when it is stored separately from
> + * the &struct property_entry instance.
> + * @value: Value of the property when it is stored inline.
> */
> struct property_entry {
> const char *name;
> size_t length;
> - bool is_array;
> + bool is_inline;
> enum dev_prop_type type;
> union {
> const void *pointer;
> @@ -262,7 +264,6 @@ struct property_entry {
> (struct property_entry) { \
> .name = _name_, \
> .length = (_len_) * __PROPERTY_ENTRY_ELEMENT_SIZE(_elem_), \
> - .is_array = true, \
> .type = DEV_PROP_##_Type_, \
> { .pointer = _val_ }, \
> }
> @@ -293,6 +294,7 @@ struct property_entry {
> (struct property_entry) { \
> .name = _name_, \
> .length = __PROPERTY_ENTRY_ELEMENT_SIZE(_elem_), \
> + .is_inline = true, \
> .type = DEV_PROP_##_Type_, \
> { .value = { ._elem_ = _val_ } }, \
> }
> @@ -311,6 +313,7 @@ struct property_entry {
> #define PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL(_name_) \
> (struct property_entry) { \
> .name = _name_, \
> + .is_inline = true, \
> }
>
> struct property_entry *
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Powered by blists - more mailing lists