[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 08:09:49 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] tty: serial: samsung_tty: use 'unsigned int' not
'unsigned'
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:08:34PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Yes. It's a long-time checkpatch warning, it's good to be explicit for
> this type of thing.
There is literally no practical benefit going either way. It is
just checkpatch forcing one personal opinion on people.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists