lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 13 Dec 2019 11:33:19 +0800
From:   rjliao@...eaurora.org
To:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc:     Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-bluetooth-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for Qualcomm
 Bluetooth SoC QCA6390

在 2019-12-12 18:32,Marcel Holtmann 写道:
> Hi Rocky,
> 
>> This patch add support for QCA6390.
> 
> can we please be a bit more descriptive on what support we are adding.
> 
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Rocky Liao <rjliao@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c   | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h   |  1 +
>> drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
>> index ec69e5dd7bd3..75990223e5e3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
>> #include "btqca.h"
>> 
>> #define VERSION "0.1"
> 
> Lets put an extra empty line here.
OK

> 
>> +#define QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type)	\
>> +	((soc_type == QCA_WCN3991) || (soc_type == QCA_QCA6390))
> 
> Actually (a == b || c == d) is enough.
> 
> I rather do ((a) == b || (c) == d) to ensure the parameter is properly
> protected. It is not needed in this case since the usage is simple.
OK

> 
>> 
>> int qca_read_soc_version(struct hci_dev *hdev, u32 *soc_version,
>> 			 enum qca_btsoc_type soc_type)
>> @@ -32,7 +34,7 @@ int qca_read_soc_version(struct hci_dev *hdev, u32 
>> *soc_version,
>> 	 * VSE event. WCN3991 sends version command response as a payload to
>> 	 * command complete event.
>> 	 */
>> -	if (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991) {
>> +	if (QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type)) {
>> 		event_type = 0;
>> 		rlen += 1;
>> 		rtype = EDL_PATCH_VER_REQ_CMD;
>> @@ -69,7 +71,7 @@ int qca_read_soc_version(struct hci_dev *hdev, u32 
>> *soc_version,
>> 		goto out;
>> 	}
>> 
>> -	if (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991)
>> +	if ((QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type)))
>> 		memmove(&edl->data, &edl->data[1], sizeof(*ver));
> 
> Maybe these should just be turned into a switch statement and not
> using some macro.
> 
Prefer to use macro or a simple function call, there are many places 
called this and use switch will make code complex

>> 
>> 	ver = (struct qca_btsoc_version *)(edl->data);
>> @@ -139,7 +141,7 @@ int qca_send_pre_shutdown_cmd(struct hci_dev 
>> *hdev)
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qca_send_pre_shutdown_cmd);
>> 
>> static void qca_tlv_check_data(struct qca_fw_config *config,
>> -				const struct firmware *fw)
>> +		 const struct firmware *fw, enum qca_btsoc_type soc_type)
>> {
>> 	const u8 *data;
>> 	u32 type_len;
>> @@ -148,6 +150,7 @@ static void qca_tlv_check_data(struct 
>> qca_fw_config *config,
>> 	struct tlv_type_hdr *tlv;
>> 	struct tlv_type_patch *tlv_patch;
>> 	struct tlv_type_nvm *tlv_nvm;
>> +	uint8_t nvm_baud_rate = config->user_baud_rate;
>> 
>> 	tlv = (struct tlv_type_hdr *)fw->data;
>> 
>> @@ -213,10 +216,14 @@ static void qca_tlv_check_data(struct 
>> qca_fw_config *config,
>> 				 * enabling software inband sleep
>> 				 * onto controller side.
>> 				 */
>> -				tlv_nvm->data[0] |= 0x80;
>> +				if (!QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type))
>> +					tlv_nvm->data[0] |= 0x80;
>> 
>> 				/* UART Baud Rate */
>> -				tlv_nvm->data[2] = config->user_baud_rate;
>> +				if ((QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type)))
>> +					tlv_nvm->data[1] = nvm_baud_rate;
>> +				else
>> +					tlv_nvm->data[2] = nvm_baud_rate;
> 
> These two changes are not related to the QCA6390 support. Leave them
> out and if changes are needed to fix other hardware, then send them as
> separate patch.
> 
OK

>> 
>> 				break;
>> 
>> @@ -264,7 +271,7 @@ static int qca_tlv_send_segment(struct hci_dev 
>> *hdev, int seg_size,
>> 	 * VSE event. WCN3991 sends version command response as a payload to
>> 	 * command complete event.
>> 	 */
>> -	if (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991) {
>> +	if ((QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type))) {
>> 		event_type = 0;
>> 		rlen = sizeof(*edl);
>> 		rtype = EDL_PATCH_TLV_REQ_CMD;
>> @@ -297,7 +304,7 @@ static int qca_tlv_send_segment(struct hci_dev 
>> *hdev, int seg_size,
>> 		err = -EIO;
>> 	}
>> 
>> -	if (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991)
>> +	if ((QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type)))
>> 		goto out;
>> 
>> 	tlv_resp = (struct tlv_seg_resp *)(edl->data);
>> @@ -354,7 +361,7 @@ static int qca_download_firmware(struct hci_dev 
>> *hdev,
>> 		return ret;
>> 	}
>> 
>> -	qca_tlv_check_data(config, fw);
>> +	qca_tlv_check_data(config, fw, soc_type);
>> 
>> 	segment = fw->data;
>> 	remain = fw->size;
>> @@ -438,6 +445,12 @@ int qca_uart_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev, uint8_t 
>> baudrate,
>> 			    (soc_ver & 0x0000000f);
>> 		snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
>> 			 "qca/crbtfw%02x.tlv", rom_ver);
>> +	} else if (soc_type == QCA_QCA6390) {
>> +		rom_ver = ((soc_ver & 0x00000f00) >> 0x04) |
>> +						(soc_ver & 0x0000000f);
>> +		snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
>> +			 "qca/htbtfw%02x.tlv", rom_ver);
>> +
>> 	} else {
>> 		snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
>> 			 "qca/rampatch_%08x.bin", soc_ver);
>> @@ -460,6 +473,9 @@ int qca_uart_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev, uint8_t 
>> baudrate,
>> 	else if (qca_is_wcn399x(soc_type))
>> 		snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
>> 			 "qca/crnv%02x.bin", rom_ver);
>> +	else if (soc_type == QCA_QCA6390)
>> +		snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
>> +			 "qca/htnv%02x.bin", rom_ver);
>> 	else
>> 		snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
>> 			 "qca/nvm_%08x.bin", soc_ver);
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
>> index f5795b1a3779..2f06ed7e1c50 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
>> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ enum qca_btsoc_type {
>> 	QCA_WCN3990,
>> 	QCA_WCN3991,
>> 	QCA_WCN3998,
>> +	QCA_QCA6390,
>> };
>> 
>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BT_QCA)
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> index f10bdf8e1fc5..472f468145e8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>> #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>> #include <linux/serdev.h>
>> @@ -1355,6 +1356,16 @@ static const struct hci_uart_proto qca_proto = 
>> {
>> 	.dequeue	= qca_dequeue,
>> };
>> 
>> +static const struct qca_vreg_data qca_soc_data_qca6174 = {
>> +	.soc_type = QCA_ROME,
>> +	.num_vregs = 0,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct qca_vreg_data qca_soc_data_qca6390 = {
>> +	.soc_type = QCA_QCA6390,
>> +	.num_vregs = 0,
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct qca_vreg_data qca_soc_data_wcn3990 = {
>> 	.soc_type = QCA_WCN3990,
>> 	.vregs = (struct qca_vreg []) {
>> @@ -1501,7 +1512,7 @@ static int qca_serdev_probe(struct serdev_device 
>> *serdev)
>> 		return -ENOMEM;
>> 
>> 	qcadev->serdev_hu.serdev = serdev;
>> -	data = of_device_get_match_data(&serdev->dev);
>> +	data = device_get_match_data(&serdev->dev);
> 
> I would address this in a separate patch since it seems you are
> actually fixing QCA6174 support as well. Or is this because the new
> platform is ACPI based. I can’t tell since you are missing a proper
> commit message.
> 
OK
>> 	serdev_device_set_drvdata(serdev, qcadev);
>> 	device_property_read_string(&serdev->dev, "firmware-name",
>> 					 &qcadev->firmware_name);
>> @@ -1534,7 +1545,10 @@ static int qca_serdev_probe(struct 
>> serdev_device *serdev)
>> 			goto out;
>> 		}
>> 	} else {
>> -		qcadev->btsoc_type = QCA_ROME;
>> +		if (data)
>> +			qcadev->btsoc_type = data->soc_type;
>> +		else
>> +			qcadev->btsoc_type = QCA_ROME;
>> 		qcadev->bt_en = devm_gpiod_get(&serdev->dev, "enable",
>> 					       GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>> 		if (IS_ERR(qcadev->bt_en)) {
>> @@ -1670,21 +1684,41 @@ static int __maybe_unused qca_resume(struct 
>> device *dev)
>> 
>> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(qca_pm_ops, qca_suspend, qca_resume);
>> 
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> static const struct of_device_id qca_bluetooth_of_match[] = {
>> -	{ .compatible = "qcom,qca6174-bt" },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,qca6174-bt"  .data = &qca_soc_data_qca6174},
> 
> So this should be clearly a separate patch as mentioned above.
> 
OK
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,qca6390-bt"  .data = &qca_soc_data_qca6390},
>> 	{ .compatible = "qcom,wcn3990-bt", .data = &qca_soc_data_wcn3990},
>> 	{ .compatible = "qcom,wcn3991-bt", .data = &qca_soc_data_wcn3991},
>> 	{ .compatible = "qcom,wcn3998-bt", .data = &qca_soc_data_wcn3998},
>> 	{ /* sentinel */ }
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qca_bluetooth_of_match);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> +static const struct acpi_device_id qca_bluetooth_acpi_match[] = {
>> +	{ "QCOM6390", (kernel_ulong_t)&qca_soc_data_qca6390 },
>> +	{ "DLA16390", (kernel_ulong_t)&qca_soc_data_qca6390 },
>> +	{ "DLB16390", (kernel_ulong_t)&qca_soc_data_qca6390 },
>> +	{ "DLB26390", (kernel_ulong_t)&qca_soc_data_qca6390 },
>> +	{ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, qca_bluetooth_acpi_match);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> 
>> static struct serdev_device_driver qca_serdev_driver = {
>> 	.probe = qca_serdev_probe,
>> 	.remove = qca_serdev_remove,
>> 	.driver = {
>> 		.name = "hci_uart_qca",
>> +		#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> 		.of_match_table = qca_bluetooth_of_match,
>> +		#endif
>> +		#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> +		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(qca_bluetooth_acpi_match),
>> +		#endif
> 
> These ifdefs are not needed. The ACPI_PTR does this automatically and
> there is another macro for OF as well that you can use.
> 
OK
>> 		.pm = &qca_pm_ops,
>> 	},
>> };
> 
> Where is the patch addressing Kconfig dependency? If you support ACPI
> and DT platforms now, you need that.
> 
OK
> Regards
> 
> Marcel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ