lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab0557bcacdae61027b775f440145b05@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 13 Dec 2019 11:35:28 +0800
From:   rjliao@...eaurora.org
To:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, bgodavar@...eaurora.org,
        linux-bluetooth-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] dt-bindings: net: bluetooth: Add device tree
 bindings for QCA6390

在 2019-12-12 18:33,Marcel Holtmann 写道:
> Hi Rocky,
> 
>> Add compatible string for the Qualcomm QCA6390 Bluetooth controller
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Rocky Liao <rjliao@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> 
>> diff --git 
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt
>> index 68b67d9db63a..87b7f9d22414 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ device the slave device is attached to.
>> Required properties:
>>  - compatible: should contain one of the following:
>>    * "qcom,qca6174-bt"
>> +   * "qcom,qca6390-bt"
>>    * "qcom,wcn3990-bt"
>>    * "qcom,wcn3998-bt"
> 
> now I am confused. Is this a DT platform or ACPI or both?
> 
We need to support both, should I update ACPI part in this doc as well?
> Regards
> 
> Marcel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ