linux-kernel - [PATCH 53/55] staging: wfx: delayed_link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191216170302.29543-54-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Dec 2019 17:04:00 +0000
From:   Jérôme Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
To:     "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jérôme Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
Subject: [PATCH 53/55] staging: wfx: delayed_link_loss cannot happen

From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>

Original code allows to detect an BSS loss during a scan and delaying
the handling of BSS loss. However, there it is no real problem to just
make these two events mutually exclusive (there is just a performance
penalty).

Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c |  4 ----
 drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c  | 18 +++---------------
 drivers/staging/wfx/wfx.h  |  1 -
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c
index bdbce6926e91..dde2f8868147 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c
@@ -95,10 +95,6 @@ void wfx_hw_scan_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	mutex_unlock(&wvif->wdev->conf_mutex);
 	mutex_unlock(&wvif->scan_lock);
 	__ieee80211_scan_completed_compat(wvif->wdev->hw, ret < 0);
-	if (wvif->delayed_link_loss) {
-		wvif->delayed_link_loss = false;
-		wfx_cqm_bssloss_sm(wvif, 1, 0, 0);
-	}
 }
 
 int wfx_hw_scan(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
index 7ae763e96455..3296bc3521d5 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
@@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ void wfx_cqm_bssloss_sm(struct wfx_vif *wvif, int init, int good, int bad)
 	int tx = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&wvif->bss_loss_lock);
-	wvif->delayed_link_loss = 0;
 	cancel_work_sync(&wvif->bss_params_work);
 
 	if (init) {
@@ -429,18 +428,9 @@ static void wfx_event_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		switch (event->evt.event_id) {
 		case HIF_EVENT_IND_BSSLOST:
 			cancel_work_sync(&wvif->unjoin_work);
-			if (mutex_trylock(&wvif->scan_lock)) {
-				wfx_cqm_bssloss_sm(wvif, 1, 0, 0);
-				mutex_unlock(&wvif->scan_lock);
-			} else {
-				/* Scan is in progress. Delay reporting.
-				 * Scan complete will trigger bss_loss_work
-				 */
-				wvif->delayed_link_loss = 1;
-				/* Also start a watchdog. */
-				schedule_delayed_work(&wvif->bss_loss_work,
-						      5 * HZ);
-			}
+			mutex_lock(&wvif->scan_lock);
+			wfx_cqm_bssloss_sm(wvif, 1, 0, 0);
+			mutex_unlock(&wvif->scan_lock);
 			break;
 		case HIF_EVENT_IND_BSSREGAINED:
 			wfx_cqm_bssloss_sm(wvif, 0, 0, 0);
@@ -497,8 +487,6 @@ static void wfx_do_unjoin(struct wfx_vif *wvif)
 {
 	mutex_lock(&wvif->wdev->conf_mutex);
 
-	wvif->delayed_link_loss = false;
-
 	if (!wvif->state)
 		goto done;
 
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/wfx.h b/drivers/staging/wfx/wfx.h
index 5e7c911db024..db433bee87af 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/wfx.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/wfx.h
@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ struct wfx_vif {
 	int			id;
 	enum wfx_state		state;
 
-	int			delayed_link_loss;
 	int			bss_loss_state;
 	u32			bss_loss_confirm_id;
 	struct mutex		bss_loss_lock;
-- 
2.20.1