[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191218072204.06ca0cd9@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:22:04 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:19:37 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:23:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c: In function 'anx6345_i2c_probe':
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'i2c_new_dummy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c:738:28: warning: assignment to 'struct i2c_client *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> > 738 | anx6345->i2c_clients[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> > | ^
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > 6aa192698089 ("drm/bridge: Add Analogix anx6345 support")
> >
> > interacting with commit
> >
> > 2c2f00ab1641 ("i2c: remove i2c_new_dummy() API")
> >
> > From Linus' tree.
> >
> > I have applied the following fix up patch for today:
> >
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:11:19 +1100
> > Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: fix up for removal of i2c_new_dummy()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
>
> Thanks pulled into drm-next since I just processed the first drm-misc-next
> pull.
Thanks. For the future, though, merge fixes like this should be part
of the actual merge commit to avoid bisection problems.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists