[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191217085947.GB2773492@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:59:47 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
william.kucharski@...cle.com, bepvte@...il.com, rppt@...ux.ibm.com,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, rientjes@...gle.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/267] 4.14.159-stable review
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 02:15:16PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > ltp-fs-tests:
> > > * proc01
> >
> > What does all of this mean?
> >
> > Can you bisect to find the offending patch?
>
> Here is the offending patch,
>
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> mm, thp, proc: report THP eligibility for each vma
>
> FYI,
> Reverted this patch and re-validated ltp-fs-tests proc01 and now
> getting PASS on arm.
Ok, I'll go drop this.
Sasha, the backport of this patch didn't work. Also you have two
"upstream commit" messages in the changelog, which feels odd :(
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists