linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb: defer free_huge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:00:54 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb: defer free_huge_page() to a workqueue

On Mon 16-12-19 13:44:53, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 12/16/19 10:38 AM, Waiman Long wrote:
[...]
> >> Can you extract guts of the testcase and integrate them into hugetlb
> >> test suite?
> 
> BTW, what hugetlb test suite are you talking about?

I was using tests from libhugetlbfs package in the past. There are few
tests in LTP project but the libhugetlbfs coverage used to cover the
largest part of the functionality.

Is there any newer home for the package than [1], Mike? Btw. would it
mak sense to migrate those tests to a more common place, LTP or kernel
selftests?

[1] https://github.com/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs/tree/master/tests
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs