[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d71943f5-9c2d-7d08-5c45-2be1be98eb73@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:38:56 +0300
From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com" <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
"joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com" <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
"rodrigo.vivi@...el.com" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: songliubraving@...com, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@...mai.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
"linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"selinux@...r.kernel.org" <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/i915/perf: open access for
CAP_SYS_PERFMON privileged process
On 17.12.2019 12:45, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> On 16/12/2019 22:03, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>> Open access to i915_perf monitoring for CAP_SYS_PERFMON privileged processes.
>> For backward compatibility reasons access to i915_perf subsystem remains open
>> for CAP_SYS_ADMIN privileged processes but CAP_SYS_ADMIN usage for secure
>> i915_perf monitoring is discouraged with respect to CAP_SYS_PERFMON capability.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
>
>
> Assuming people are fine with this new cap, I like this idea of a lighter privilege for i915-perf.
Lionel, thanks for your meaningful input!
Appreciate your collaboration.
Regards,
Alexey
>
>
> -Lionel
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists