[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2GaLE8cEp_Dp+zonH7sTJ8F7B67S70kASzwctxevQ62w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 19:05:51 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] nfsd: avoid 32-bit time_t
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 6:25 PM J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 06:21:06PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 3:12 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/playground.git y2038-nfsd-v2
> >
> > in my y2038 branch now, so it should be part of linux-next from the coming
> > snapshot. My plan is to send a linux-5.6 pull request to the nfsd
> > maintainers for
> > this branch unless we find bugs in linux-next or I get more review comments.
>
> Sorry for the silence. The patches look fine to me, so I took them from
> your git branch and applied them to my local tree (after fixing up some
> minor conflicts with the copy patches) and then saw some
> delegation-related test failures, which I haven't had the chance to
> investigate yet. Hopefully before the end of the week.
Ok, I've taken the nfsd changes out of my y2038 branch again then, to
make sure we don't get these regressions in linux-next.
Thanks for taking care of the patches. I will not be in the office from
Friday to the end of the year, so probably won't be able to respin the
series quickly once you find the bug(s), but I should be able to reply
to emails about this.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists