linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] nfsd: avoid 32-bit time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191218172458.GA24295@fieldses.org>
Date:   Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:24:58 -0500
From:   "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] nfsd: avoid 32-bit time_t

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 06:21:06PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 3:12 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bruce, Chuck,
> >
> > NFSd is one of the last areas of the kernel that is not y2038 safe
> > yet, this series addresses the remaining issues here.
> >
> > I did not get any comments for the first version I posted [1], and
> > I hope this just means that everything was fine and you plan to
> > merge this soon ;-)
> >
> > I uploaded a git branch to [2] for testing.
> >
> > Please review and merge for linux-5.6 so we can remove the 32-bit
> > time handling from that release.
> 
> I've included the update y2038 nfsd branch from
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/playground.git y2038-nfsd-v2
> 
> in my y2038 branch now, so it should be part of linux-next from the coming
> snapshot. My plan is to send a linux-5.6 pull request to the nfsd
> maintainers for
> this branch unless we find bugs in linux-next or I get more review comments.

Sorry for the silence.  The patches look fine to me, so I took them from
your git branch and applied them to my local tree (after fixing up some
minor conflicts with the copy patches) and then saw some
delegation-related test failures, which I haven't had the chance to
investigate yet.  Hopefully before the end of the week.

--b.