linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] nfsd: avoid 32-bit time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a11e1OsP+KR5rYPyYo_nMz=y2_fqb6ZCmaQ_RUFcoEkrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Dec 2019 18:21:06 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc:     Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] nfsd: avoid 32-bit time_t

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 3:12 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce, Chuck,
>
> NFSd is one of the last areas of the kernel that is not y2038 safe
> yet, this series addresses the remaining issues here.
>
> I did not get any comments for the first version I posted [1], and
> I hope this just means that everything was fine and you plan to
> merge this soon ;-)
>
> I uploaded a git branch to [2] for testing.
>
> Please review and merge for linux-5.6 so we can remove the 32-bit
> time handling from that release.

I've included the update y2038 nfsd branch from

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/playground.git y2038-nfsd-v2

in my y2038 branch now, so it should be part of linux-next from the coming
snapshot. My plan is to send a linux-5.6 pull request to the nfsd
maintainers for
this branch unless we find bugs in linux-next or I get more review comments.

        Arnd