lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2e86d54-287a-16b4-3dac-9e3fe3dee753@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:30:38 +0100
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@...hiba.co.jp>
Cc:     linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp,
        shrirang.bagul@...onical.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serdev: Don't claim unsupported serial devices

Hi,

On 19-12-2019 01:37, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> writes:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 18-12-2019 07:56, Punit Agrawal wrote:
>>> Serdev sub-system claims all serial devices that are not already
>>> enumerated. As a result, no device node is created for serial port on
>>> certain boards such as the Apollo Lake based UP2. This has the
>>> unintended consequence of not being able to raise the login prompt via
>>> serial connection.
>>>
>>> Introduce a blacklist to reject devices that should not be treated as
>>> a serdev device. Add the Intel HS UART peripheral ids to the blacklist
>>> to bring back serial port on SoCs carrying them.
>>>
>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@...hiba.co.jp>
>>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>>> Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>>
>> Thank you for addressing this long standing issue.
> 
> I am surprised there hasn't been more people complaining! Maybe even on
> x86 mainline isn't that widely used on development boards.

I think it is also a case of there not being that manu x86 development
boards.

Regards,

Hans

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ