[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2e86d54-287a-16b4-3dac-9e3fe3dee753@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:30:38 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@...hiba.co.jp>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp,
shrirang.bagul@...onical.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serdev: Don't claim unsupported serial devices
Hi,
On 19-12-2019 01:37, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 18-12-2019 07:56, Punit Agrawal wrote:
>>> Serdev sub-system claims all serial devices that are not already
>>> enumerated. As a result, no device node is created for serial port on
>>> certain boards such as the Apollo Lake based UP2. This has the
>>> unintended consequence of not being able to raise the login prompt via
>>> serial connection.
>>>
>>> Introduce a blacklist to reject devices that should not be treated as
>>> a serdev device. Add the Intel HS UART peripheral ids to the blacklist
>>> to bring back serial port on SoCs carrying them.
>>>
>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@...hiba.co.jp>
>>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>>> Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>>
>> Thank you for addressing this long standing issue.
>
> I am surprised there hasn't been more people complaining! Maybe even on
> x86 mainline isn't that widely used on development boards.
I think it is also a case of there not being that manu x86 development
boards.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists