[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec41d021-ddf3-b052-45ca-d2c1d149c26c@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 10:38:32 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Shyam Kumar Thella <sthella@...eaurora.org>
Cc: agross@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmem: add QTI SDAM driver
On 17/12/2019 09:20, Shyam Kumar Thella wrote:
> QTI SDAM driver allows PMIC peripherals to access the shared memory
> that is available on QTI PMICs.
>
> Change-Id: I40005646ab1fbba9e0e4aa68e0a61cfbc7b51ba6
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Kumar Thella <sthella@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/Kconfig | 8 ++
> drivers/nvmem/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/qcom-spmi-sdam.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 206 insertions(+)
Not repeating comments from Bjorn,
Apart from that I have twos comment.
1>
Any reason why there is no Device tree bindings documented for this driver?
> create mode 100644 drivers/nvmem/qcom-spmi-sdam.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig b/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig
> index 73567e9..35efab1 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig
> @@ -109,6 +109,14 @@ config QCOM_QFPROM
> This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> will be called nvmem_qfprom.
>
> +config NVMEM_SPMI_SDAM
> + tristate "SPMI SDAM Support"
> + depends on SPMI
> + help
> + This driver supports the Shared Direct Access Memory Module on
> + Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. PMICs. It provides the clients
> + an interface to read/write to the SDAM module's shared memory.
> +
> config ROCKCHIP_EFUSE
> tristate "Rockchip eFuse Support"
> depends on ARCH_ROCKCHIP || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/Makefile b/drivers/nvmem/Makefile
> index 9e66782..877a0b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/Makefile
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_EFUSE) += nvmem_mtk-efuse.o
> nvmem_mtk-efuse-y := mtk-efuse.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_QFPROM) += nvmem_qfprom.o
> nvmem_qfprom-y := qfprom.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_NVMEM_SPMI_SDAM) += qcom-spmi-sdam.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_EFUSE) += nvmem_rockchip_efuse.o
> nvmem_rockchip_efuse-y := rockchip-efuse.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_OTP) += nvmem-rockchip-otp.o
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qcom-spmi-sdam.c b/drivers/nvmem/qcom-spmi-sdam.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e80a446
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qcom-spmi-sdam.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
...
> +
> +static int sdam_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct sdam_chip *sdam;
> + struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
> + struct nvmem_config *sdam_config;
> + unsigned int val = 0;
> + int rc;
> +
> + sdam = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sdam), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!sdam)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + sdam_config = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sdam_config),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!sdam_config)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + sdam->regmap = dev_get_regmap(pdev->dev.parent, NULL);
> + if (!sdam->regmap) {
> + pr_err("Failed to get regmap handle\n");
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> +
> + rc = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "reg", &sdam->base);
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + pr_err("Failed to get SDAM base, rc=%d\n", rc);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + rc = regmap_read(sdam->regmap, sdam->base + SDAM_SIZE, &val);
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + pr_err("Failed to read SDAM_SIZE rc=%d\n", rc);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + sdam->size = val * 32;
> +
> + sdam_config->dev = &pdev->dev;
> + sdam_config->name = "spmi_sdam";
> + sdam_config->id = pdev->id;
> + sdam_config->owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + sdam_config->stride = 1;
> + sdam_config->word_size = 1;
> + sdam_config->reg_read = sdam_read;
> + sdam_config->reg_write = sdam_write;
> + sdam_config->priv = sdam;
> +
> + nvmem = nvmem_register(sdam_config);
2>
May be devm_nvmem_register() here would be better.
--srini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists