linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] KVM: Dirty ring interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:43:54 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] KVM: Dirty ring interface

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 04:38:03PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> If you see three identical half-posted series which only contains
> patches 00-09... I am very sorry for ruining your inbox...  I think my
> mail server is not happy to continue sending the rest of the patches,
> and I'll get this during sending the patch 10:
> 
> 4.3.0 Temporary System Problem.  Try again later (10). d25sm3385231qtq.11 - gsmtp
> 
> So far I don't see what's wrong with patch 10, either.
> 
> I'll try to fix it up before I send 4th time (or anyone knows please
> hint me)... Please ignore the previous three in-complete versions.

Please add RESEND in the subject when resending an idential patch (set),
it gives recipients a heads up that the two (or four :-)) sets are the
same, e.g. previous versions can be ignored if he/she received both the
original and RESEND version(s).

  [PATCH RESEND v2 00/17] KVM: Dirty ring interface