lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 20 Dec 2019 21:11:04 -0500
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] KVM: Dirty ring interface

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 01:43:54PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 04:38:03PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> > If you see three identical half-posted series which only contains
> > patches 00-09... I am very sorry for ruining your inbox...  I think my
> > mail server is not happy to continue sending the rest of the patches,
> > and I'll get this during sending the patch 10:
> > 
> > 4.3.0 Temporary System Problem.  Try again later (10). d25sm3385231qtq.11 - gsmtp
> > 
> > So far I don't see what's wrong with patch 10, either.
> > 
> > I'll try to fix it up before I send 4th time (or anyone knows please
> > hint me)... Please ignore the previous three in-complete versions.
> 
> Please add RESEND in the subject when resending an idential patch (set),
> it gives recipients a heads up that the two (or four :-)) sets are the
> same, e.g. previous versions can be ignored if he/she received both the
> original and RESEND version(s).
> 
>   [PATCH RESEND v2 00/17] KVM: Dirty ring interface

Thanks Sean, new version sent.  Just in case if anyone read the old
versions: they have exactly the same content with the RESEND series.
I still resent the first 10 emails just to make things simple.

-- 
Peter Xu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ