[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191221021104.GA59330@xz-x1>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 21:11:04 -0500
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] KVM: Dirty ring interface
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 01:43:54PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 04:38:03PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> > If you see three identical half-posted series which only contains
> > patches 00-09... I am very sorry for ruining your inbox... I think my
> > mail server is not happy to continue sending the rest of the patches,
> > and I'll get this during sending the patch 10:
> >
> > 4.3.0 Temporary System Problem. Try again later (10). d25sm3385231qtq.11 - gsmtp
> >
> > So far I don't see what's wrong with patch 10, either.
> >
> > I'll try to fix it up before I send 4th time (or anyone knows please
> > hint me)... Please ignore the previous three in-complete versions.
>
> Please add RESEND in the subject when resending an idential patch (set),
> it gives recipients a heads up that the two (or four :-)) sets are the
> same, e.g. previous versions can be ignored if he/she received both the
> original and RESEND version(s).
>
> [PATCH RESEND v2 00/17] KVM: Dirty ring interface
Thanks Sean, new version sent. Just in case if anyone read the old
versions: they have exactly the same content with the RESEND series.
I still resent the first 10 emails just to make things simple.
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists