linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] USB: EHCI: ehci-mv: drop pxa_ehci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1fdbe2d493b71ed2105a8976ebbccbba28adfe26.camel@v3.sk>
Date:   Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:55:07 +0100
From:   Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: EHCI: ehci-mv: drop pxa_ehci_type and unused
 device IDs

On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 08:35 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 08:02:02AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > A trivial cleanup.
> 
> How is dropping device ids a "trivial cleanup"?
> 
> Please be more descriptive as to why you are making a change.

Thanks for the response. I'll post a v2 with a hopefully better
description.

> Also, you sent a number of patches here and I do not know what order
> they should be applied in.  Please resend them all as a numbered patch
> series so that I have a clue what to do.

I did that because the patches are completely independent of each other
-- they don't conflict and don't need to be applied any particular
order. Would you still prefer a numbered series?

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Thank you
Lubo