linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] USB: EHCI: ehci-mv: drop pxa_ehci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Dec 2019 11:14:58 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Cc:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: EHCI: ehci-mv: drop pxa_ehci_type and unused device
 IDs

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 09:55:07AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 08:35 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 08:02:02AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > > A trivial cleanup.
> > 
> > How is dropping device ids a "trivial cleanup"?
> > 
> > Please be more descriptive as to why you are making a change.
> 
> Thanks for the response. I'll post a v2 with a hopefully better
> description.
> 
> > Also, you sent a number of patches here and I do not know what order
> > they should be applied in.  Please resend them all as a numbered patch
> > series so that I have a clue what to do.
> 
> I did that because the patches are completely independent of each other
> -- they don't conflict and don't need to be applied any particular
> order. Would you still prefer a numbered series?

A numbered series is always easier.

thanks,

greg k-h