[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <400d28a9-6ae3-5ff3-8d95-005714cfca33@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:22:14 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
CC: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...obroma-systems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: drop #clock-cells from
rockchip,px30-dsi-dphy
Hi,
On 20/12/19 5:07 pm, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
>
> Am Freitag, 20. Dezember 2019, 12:21:28 CET schrieb Kishon Vijay Abraham I:
>>
>> On 16/12/19 11:31 pm, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> Am Montag, 16. Dezember 2019, 18:56:15 CET schrieb Rob Herring:
>>>> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:24:47 +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>>>>> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...obroma-systems.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Further review of the dsi components for the px30 revealed that the
>>>>> phy shouldn't expose the pll as clock but instead handle settings
>>>>> via phy parameters.
>>>>>
>>>>> As the phy binding is new and not used anywhere yet, just drop them
>>>>> so they don't get used.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 3817c7961179 ("dt-bindings: phy: add yaml binding for rockchip,px30-dsi-dphy")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...obroma-systems.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Hi Kishon,
>>>>>
>>>>> maybe suitable as a fix for 5.5-rc?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Heiko
>>>>>
>>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,px30-dsi-dphy.yaml | 5 -----
>>>>> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
>>>> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
>>>> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>>>>
>>>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>>
>>> sorry about that. The original response somehow did not thread correctly
>>> in my mail client, probably some fault on my side, so I've only found your
>>> mail just now by digging hard.
>>>
>>> @Kishon, the original mail already got an
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>
>> merged now, Thanks!
>
> thanks ... just to make sure, did you also see the driver changes in patch2?
> As I don't see them in either of your branches :-)
For some reason, patch 2 of the "RESEND" series is not in my inbox.
However looking at your original series, looks like this is a candidate
for 5.6. I'll take patch 2 from your original series.
Thanks
Kishon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists