[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191223120428.GB114474@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 07:04:28 -0500
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
Cc: sudeep.dutt@...el.com, ashutosh.dixit@...el.com, arnd@...db.de,
vincent.whitchurch@...s.com, alexios.zavras@...el.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, allison@...utok.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xue.zhihong@....com.cn,
up2wing@...il.com, wang.liang82@....com.cn,
Huang Zijiang <huang.zijiang@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: Use kzalloc() instead of kmalloc() with flag
GFP_ZERO.
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 09:51:58AM +0800, Yi Wang wrote:
> From: Huang Zijiang <huang.zijiang@....com.cn>
>
> Use kzalloc instead of manually setting kmalloc
> with flag GFP_ZERO since kzalloc sets allocated memory
> to zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Zijiang <huang.zijiang@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/misc/mic/host/mic_boot.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/mic/host/mic_boot.c b/drivers/misc/mic/host/mic_boot.c
> index 7335759..c1f87a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/mic/host/mic_boot.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/mic/host/mic_boot.c
> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static void *__mic_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> struct scif_hw_dev *scdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> struct mic_device *mdev = scdev_to_mdev(scdev);
> dma_addr_t tmp;
> - void *va = kmalloc(size, gfp | __GFP_ZERO);
> +void *va = kzalloc(size, gfp);
Odd indation :(
Always use checkpatch.pl on your patches to ensure you do not add new
problems.
How did this get past 2 different people???
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists